Jump to content

Talk:Thomas C. Hanks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy

[edit]

He seems like an important scientist. To me, the intro makes it clear his (if marginal) significance. -- Taku (talk) 23:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dont believe this guy is important enough to be on wikipedia, many people are quoted by journals that does not mean they should be in a Encyclopedia. I suggest this entry to be deleted. Simbioz (talk) 18:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is he not important? Wikipedia should have a good coverage of prominent seismologists. Isn't he one of them? -- Taku (talk) 23:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]